Skip to main content

Rouya

EN
AR

From Decks to Deliverables

Reflections
Decoding "Consultancy Speak"
Share via
Share via
Cancel

Dina Rashid and Skander Ben Ahmed are part of the Rouya Storytelling department and think about language and words daily. As people who had not worked in a consultancy before, they realised that there were many terms and phrases around them that they had never heard before. So, they decided to make a list and have a candid conversation about language, influence, and their personal experiences.

 

Dina Rashid: Okay, so just for the record, you and I have been making a list of terms or phrases that we’ve heard being used by our colleagues and peers, which we’ve called “consultancy speak”, and we’ve decided that we should sit and have a thoughtful conversation about it. So I want to start with… how do you think this “consultancy speak” phenomenon started?

 

Skander Ben Ahmed: Yeah, I mean, it’s normal to use words to describe regular processes, but in specialist words, for example, a surgeon or doctor may describe a bruise as “trauma as a result of an impact”. So I think maybe from that perspective, I can understand the necessity.

 

Dina Rashid: So I did a little bit of research. Big consultancy firms, back in the day, started using these terms in their publications, reports, etc., and those terms caught on and became part of the everyday language used by consultants and “business people”. And as you said, it’s for the sake of accuracy. But I can’t help but feel as if, quite often, it’s not very conducive to success, and people on forums usually talk about how awkward they feel or how they worry about starting to use these in everyday life. What do you think is the advantage of using this industry jargon?

 

Skander Ben Ahmed: Hmm, so this raises an important question. Is consultancy speak important when talking consultant to consultant, or consultant-client? If it’s consultant to consultant, maybe it helps to ensure understanding and “alignment”. Although consultant-client relationships can give the client a sense of security, I can see consultancy speak backfiring, creating a disconnect between client and consultant and possibly leading to distrust. “Is this person being genuine, or are they just playing with words?”

 

Dina Rashid: That’s so true! One of the things that came up when I was looking at why people use this language was that it allows consultants to frame things in a polite way. So, it’s always masking the more straightforward, “blunt” way of speaking.

 

Skander Ben Ahmed: Being diplomatic.

 

Dina Rashid: Let’s imagine you were setting up an interpretation business, and you hired a consultancy to make a comms plan, and they come to you, and they start saying stuff like, “We’re putting together a micro-inspirations deck”, etc. How would you perceive that?

 

Skander Ben Ahmed: I would be nervous, maybe even a bit skeptical of the process.

 

Dina Rashid: Would it have made you feel like they know what they’re talking about?

 

Skander Ben Ahmed: Maybe a part of me would think, “These guys are experts, no need to worry.” You know what I mean? If they used plain English or Arabic, I would feel more comfortable. But I think a healthy mix of both might be better. It’d be beneficial for me, too, as a layperson, to hear these industry words. What about you?

 

Dina Rashid: I’ll be honest. If I hired a consultancy and they used terms I didn’t understand to communicate certain concepts with me, I would doubt how effective they are. But it’s interesting because I think my primary interest in using consultancy speak is that it stops people from underestimating me or makes me feel more secure. I don’t find it particularly efficient otherwise, and it’s not how I normally speak, so there is a little “pushback” on my end to fully adopting this lingo. This brings me to my next question: Is this something you wish someone had spoken to you about when you started working?

 

Skander Ben Ahmed: No, not really. It’s part of the learning experience, and as someone who’s interested in language, I found it amusing.

 

Dina Rashid: I definitely would have wanted some more clarity before I started because there were several times at first when even using the word “deck” instead of “presentation” would confuse me initially. I would just pretend that I understood what people were talking about. I imagine the people we work with, who have been using this language as part of their jobs for a very long time, might have a different view on this.

 

Skander Ben Ahmed: Yeah, or maybe they feel the same but don’t feel that the workplace is the right place for them to speak about their views, right?

 

Dina Rashid: That’s very astute of you. Okay, I’ve put a list together of some words and phrases to test you on. They’re common, but maybe not ones you may have encountered yourself. The first one is “on the beach”.

 

Skander Ben Ahmed: To put a hold on something, right? Like, “We considered doing that last year, but it’s been on the beach ever since.”

 

Dina Rashid: Hmm, okay, so I’ll give you an example. “Skander’s been on the beach this month.”

 

Skander Ben Ahmed: He’s been sitting on the bench. He’s taking a back seat.

Dina Rashid: Yeah! He’s taking time off or not getting any clients at the moment. Another water-related one is “Boiling the ocean”. I quite like this one.

 

Skander Ben Ahmed: Being too ambitious, trying to boil the ocean?

 

Dina Rashid: You’re on the right track.

 

Skander Ben Ahmed: Like moving mountains? 

 

Dina Rashid: That makes so much sense even though that’s wrong, which is why I feel like none of this is accurate language. In any case, an example could be, “Don’t boil the ocean for an exact number; just give me an estimate.”

 

Skander Ben Ahmed: Don’t overthink it, maybe? Don’t bend over backwards.

 

Dina Rashid: Yeah, you got it! Okay, we’ve already heard “being agnostic” about something, “parking lot”, and “spicy worries” in our jobs. But possibly my favourite, which we haven’t heard yet, and I hope I hear it out in the wild one day, is “double-click”. What do you think that means?

 

Skander Ben Ahmed: Haha, honestly, I’m not sure.

 

Dina Rashid: An example would be, “Can we pause for a moment and double-click on that point?” It’s just so unusual, but it’s great because it seemingly lacks poetry; it’s just about double-clicking on something. I love it.

 

Skander Ben Ahmed: It almost seems like a different genre of language altogether. It does make me question, though, whether these terms only work in English or are transferable to other languages as well.

 

Dina Rashid: Have you come across people using specific consultancy speak in Arabic?

 

Skander Ben Ahmed: Not really, no. There are a lot of proverbs in Arabic, and they are one of the best ways to establish understanding and deliver meaning. For example, a very commonly used proverb, which is actually a verse from the Holy Quran, is “ʿAsā an takrahū shay’an wa huwa khayrun lakum”. It means that you may initially dislike something and it might turn out to be a blessing in disguise.

 

Dina Rashid: That’s a great sentiment that works well in a consultancy environment. It may be that consultancy speak is an English-centric thing. But I imagine even in other European languages, people probably use these words interspersed with their regular language, like they would throw in a “circle back”.

 

Skander Ben Ahmed: In French, they always borrow English terms, like team building and start-up. Do you think you have to go to school, so to speak, to learn these terms?

 

Dina Rashid: There is a website that is a dictionary for many of these languages, but interestingly, some I didn’t understand even after reading the dictionary.

 

Skander Ben Ahmed: Much comes from exposure and learning to use these words.

 

Dina Rashid: Yeah, absolutely. As we wrap up, my last question is: Do you want to continue with our little exercise of sharing these terms as we come across them?

 

Skander Ben Ahmed: Yes! Because it gives us another shade of understanding regarding the field in which we work. It’s awareness; it’s been like a fun learning experience for me.

 

Dina Rashid: It’s helped me own a little bit of that insecurity that I sometimes felt and turn it into something that I can learn from, but also just acknowledging that this phenomenon exists has been helpful too, that I’m not the only one who finds this intriguing in my head. Hopefully, this blog will help other people feel that way, too.

Dina Rashid
Dina Rashid
With over a decade of experience, Dina blends storytelling, research, and content strategy to craft impactful narratives. She brings strategic insight to Rouya clients—including MiZa, the UAE Pavilion at Expo, and the UAE National Orchestra—helping them develop persuasive communication and narrative strategies. To know more about Dina’s work for the UAE Pavilion, read our case study.

In the Questions Between Words

Reflections
The Intersection of Literature and the Workplace
Share via
Share via
Cancel

Before entering the workforce, I learned at university that thinking was a transferable skill that could be honed. It wasn’t always readily clear how mulling over words and ideas could prove to an employer that I deserved to be hired, but 10 years later, not a day has gone by where learning to read and think has not been valuable. Whether it’s thinking through reading, or reading through thinking, the process of dissecting, deconstructing, and finding multiple meanings in text is my secret “party trick,” and its value to me grows greater with every passing year.

 

Every single bit of communication we encounter–from media, advertisers, politicians, or leaders–is trying to tell us a story. To be able to think critically about these stories, break them down, and understand them piece by piece, is crucial to navigating life with an informed mind. What is the author trying to say? Why do they want to say this here, now? Why did they use this word? Every question leads to another, creating a linking chain of thoughts that all form a cohesive picture of my own understanding.

 

Learning to be a critical thinker takes time, especially if you’ve grown up in an environment where “thinking too much” is discouraged. When I started to work on my ability to question through literature, and revel in my own interpretation, I uncovered a newfound confidence in how I saw the world, why I saw it the way I did, and in the consideration of other perspectives. I realised I could take any situation, work of art, or conversation, and start asking the questions that would lead me to the right answers. Just as I would with a line of poetry, I had unknowingly honed this skill of being able to break down complexity or simplicity into questions, however scattered, so that a simple idea could be made more complex, or a complex idea made simple.

 

This ties very closely to one of my favourite essays, The Death of the Author by Roland Barthes, that argues that the meaning of a text (and perhaps of everything) is not what the author intended it to be, but what the reader interprets. Applying that to one of my favourite poems as an example, we could analyse these four lines from The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock by T. S. Eliot:

 

“Do I dare

 

Disturb the universe?

 

In a minute there is time

 

For decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse.”

 

Analysing poetry, or any kind of communication, is an endeavour of questioning. “Do I dare” –who is the “I”? And why the use of “dare”? Is this an act of courage or recklessness? The use of the word “disturb” also opens up a wide range of interpretations. Is the disturbance a conscious act of doing a specific action, or is it coming from the narrator’s own sense of existential crisis? How does one “disturb the universe”? Does “disturb” carry moral weight? Is the narrator wrestling with whether it’s right or wrong to cause this disturbance? The questions may seem endless, but with practice, this allows you to be critical and meticulous about every situation you encounter.

 

At the workplace, like with poetry, dissecting complex reports or strategies, breaking them down into manageable pieces, and analysing information enables me to identify gaps and propose solutions that may not be immediately obvious. Understanding the subtle nuances in a client’s feedback helps me tailor my approach to meet their exact needs, and drawing parallels between themes helps me find the best path forward. In situations of team conflicts, it helps me listen, ask probing questions, and sift through the fog to find solutions. Perhaps most importantly, it helps me collaborate better within a team, whether that involves brainstorming, receiving/giving feedback or taking in other people’s perspectives. In crude terms, these are clear workplace-related benefits that I’ve transferred from my literary analyses.

 

One of my favourite parts about analysing text is finding connections. If you read a line of poetry or prose and start to deconstruct the text, you can eventually start comparing and find threads of meaning that correlate to other pieces of text or works of art. The possibilities are as vast as your imagination, and have nothing to do with what the intended meaning by the author was. The more you do it, the more comparisons you can make, regardless of their absurdity. You could be as specific as comparing the use of the word “and” between two poems, or as general as comparing how love is being described by two authors. This exercise of finding threads of meaning, and breathing life into these narratives, is an exercise in freedom. Once you allow your mind to think freely and throw away “correct” interpretations, you free yourself from the mental constraints of “right” interpretations and “right” ways of thinking, opening your mind up to a much wider world of possibilities. This process is especially helpful for problem-solving, brainstorming, or more critical-thinking endeavours like risk assessments, when “out of the box” ideas are welcome and required.

 

Giving space to my own interpretations is an endeavour of self-realisation. When I give my ideas the space to breathe, and I do them the courtesy of questioning and dissecting, I know that I’m allowing my mind to exercise its ability to widen its scope of thought. It’s not sufficient for me to learn how to think; I want to really enjoy these flights of fancies and validate their existence. 

 

Now, when I sit in meetings, or I’m given a text to edit, or asked for feedback on a concept–all of these “thinking” skills come into action. The practice of questioning and letting ideas grow into solid concepts allows me not only to become a valuable contributor to conversations, but also to identify gaps that others may not see. I can be more decisive about my ideas and advocate for them because I put them through a rigorous process of questioning before I voice them. And most importantly, I can listen, empathise and absorb other perspectives, allowing for even more creativity and imagination to measure against an idea I have and form more thoughtful opinions.

 

At Rouya, our vision is centred around ihsan, an idea of excellence that encapsulates all aspects of our time, whether that be in how we work with people, the work that we deliver, or indeed how we care for ourselves. Ultimately, I find that the way I can bring ihsan (or excellence) into the work that we do at Rouya lies in fulfilling the potential of my ‘Self’ through the thinking process I learned and honed over the years. For me, literature holds the key to it all.

Dina Rashid
Dina Rashid
With over a decade of experience, Dina blends storytelling, research, and content strategy to craft impactful narratives. She brings strategic insight to Rouya clients—including MiZa, the UAE Pavilion at Expo, and the UAE National Orchestra—helping them develop persuasive communication and narrative strategies. To know more about Dina’s work for the UAE Pavilion, read our case study.